How Can Universities Reform Themselves to Protect Open Inquiry on Campus?

Don't miss our exciting panel discussion. Register Today! Event Date: Wednesday, September 27, 4pm ET

Learn More.
Heterodox Academy
Back to Reports
2021 CES Cover
+Viewpoint Diversity+Campus Climate

2021 Campus Expression Survey Report

Executive Summary of Findings:

  1. Overall, 60% of college students expressed reluctance to discuss at least one controversial topic (i.e., politics, religion, race, sexual orientation, and gender), similar to last year’s numbers. 
  2. Students who reported having low interaction quality with classmates (i.e., not much opportunity to get to know other students) also reported greater reluctance to discuss all five of the core controversial topics. This finding suggests that, in the future, professors may facilitate more critical conversations if they also facilitate students getting to know one another.
  3. Students’ political party and race/ethnicity seem to play a role in how reluctant they are to discuss a number of controversial topics, with Republican and Independent students and white and Asian students being most reluctant.
  4. There are a number of feared consequences (e.g., being criticized as offensive) that seem to prevent some students from discussing controversial topics in class. However, when students were asked what they would do if a classmate expressed an opinion with which they strongly disagreed, the overwhelming response was to ask questions to understand the other student’s opinion better.
  5. Eighty percent of the student sample reported being vaccinated. Unvaccinated students were more reluctant to discuss COVID-19 than vaccinated students.

Additional Downloads


Get HxA In Your Inbox

Related Reports
2022 ces cover tan
2022 Campus Expression Survey Report
+Viewpoint Diversity+Campus Climate
Annual report 22 tan
HxA Annual Report FY2022
February 13, 2023+Team HxA
Make a donation
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.