Universities Can’t Pursue Truth Without Viewpoint Diversity

John Tomasi and Jonathan Haidt's latest op-ed on what we wish critics of viewpoint diversity on both the left and right would understand.

Read the op-ed
Heterodox Academy
Back to Podcasts
November 30, 2018
+STEM

Episode 40: Tania Reynolds, Men as Stereotypical Perpetrators of Harm

When you make moral judgments, what is happening at the psychological level? According to one theory, you’re applying a template of two roles: an intentional wrongdoer and a sensitive and vulnerable victim. The more closely that template fits a situation, the more likely you are to deem the situation immoral. Research by today’s guest, Tania Reynolds, shows how these moral evaluations intersect with gender, and it reveals that people more easily stereotype men as powerful wrongdoers, and women as sensitive victims. Tania is a social psychologist and postdoctoral fellow at the Kinsey Institute. She’s joining us from Bloomington, Indiana. Timeline 1:26 Kurt Gray’s Moral Theory 7:00 Stereotypes: men as agents, women as patients 8:46 Victims are presumed female 12:01 A study with non-Americans 17:00 Implications for policies like affirmative action 27:30 Do men assume the status quo is normal? 31:22 The double-edged sword for men Links   See the full list of episodes of Half Hour of Heterodoxy >>

Transcript

This is a transcript of this episode.
Share:

Get HxA In Your Inbox

Related Podcasts
IMG 1580 Large
S2 Episode 40: Embracing Disagreement and Diversity at the University of Denver with Chancellor Jeremy Haefner
November 18, 2025+Jeremy Haefner
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Academic Freedom+Institutional Neutrality
Screenshot 2025 10 07 at 8 23 55 AM
S2 Episode 39: Rebuilding Trust in Higher Ed with Chancellor Andrew Martin
October 7, 2025+Andrew Martin
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Academic Freedom
Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.