Back to Podcasts
November 30, 2018
+STEM
Episode 40: Tania Reynolds, Men as Stereotypical Perpetrators of Harm
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Android | RSS
When you make moral judgments, what is happening at the psychological level? According to one theory, you’re applying a template of two roles: an intentional wrongdoer and a sensitive and vulnerable victim. The more closely that template fits a situation, the more likely you are to deem the situation immoral. Research by today’s guest, Tania Reynolds, shows how these moral evaluations intersect with gender, and it reveals that people more easily stereotype men as powerful wrongdoers, and women as sensitive victims. Tania is a social psychologist and postdoctoral fellow at the Kinsey Institute. She’s joining us from Bloomington, Indiana. Timeline 1:26 Kurt Gray’s Moral Theory 7:00 Stereotypes: men as agents, women as patients 8:46 Victims are presumed female 12:01 A study with non-Americans 17:00 Implications for policies like affirmative action 27:30 Do men assume the status quo is normal? 31:22 The double-edged sword for men Links- Tania Reynolds’s Google Scholar page
- Kurt Gray, Liane Young, & Adam Waytz, 2012, Mind Perception is the Essence of Morality
- Michaella Fitzpatrick, & Natalie Delia Deckard, 2017, The Common Sense Cut and the Gendered Body Project: Constructing Existing Norms around Genital Cutting in U.S. Media
- David Benatar, The Second Sexism: Discrimination Against Men and Boys
- Warren Farrell, The Myth of Male Power
Transcript
This is a transcript of this episode.Related Podcasts
S2 Episode 25: The Golden Era of Jewish-Muslim Dialogue: What Can We Learn Today?
November 26, 2024+Elisha Russ-Fishbane
+Viewpoint Diversity+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Faith & Religion
S2 Episode 24: From Wokeness to Pluralism: A New Vision for Universities
November 12, 2024+Eboo Patel
+Viewpoint Diversity+Public Policy+Campus Policy+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI)+Faith & Religion
great minds don't
always think alike
Make a Donation
Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.