#HxA2025 Registration now open! Attend the conference where open minds meet.

NYC June 23-25, 2025 | Register before June 16

Register
Heterodox Academy
Back to Podcasts
October 19, 2019
+Constructive Disagreement

Episode 69: Sheila Heen, Difficult Conversations for Faculty and Students — Part 1

Sheila Heen is my guest today. She’s the coauthor of Difficult Conversations: How to Discuss What Matters Most (1999), a New York Times Business Bestseller that has continuously been in print. An updated 10th anniversary edition was published in 2010. She’s also the coauthor of Thanks for the Feedback: The Science and Art of Receiving Feedback Well (Even When It’s Off-Base, Unfair, Poorly Delivered and Frankly, You’re Not in the Mood), a New York Times bestseller. She is a lecturer at Harvard Law School and a founder of Triad Consulting Group. We discuss difficult conversations between faculty and students in this episode, the first of two episodes with Sheila Heen. Part II is available here. We recorded this using Skype because of technical problems with the application that we normally use. You may notice lower audio quality. Here is a transcript of this episode.

Rating the Show

If you enjoyed this show, please rate it on iTunes:
  1. Go to the show’s iTunes page and click “View in iTunes”
  2. Click “Ratings and Reviews” which is to the right of “Details”
  3. Next to “Click to Rate” select the stars.
See the full list of episodes of Half Hour of Heterodoxy >>
Share:

Get HxA In Your Inbox

Related Podcasts
JT Roth
S2 Episode 37: How Can We Fix Our Universities Without Burning Them Down? With Michael Roth
June 2, 2025+Michael Roth
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Academic Freedom
IMG 5918
S2 Episode 36: Can This AI Tool Save Campus Dialogue? With Simon Cullen
May 20, 2025+Simon Cullen
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+STEM+Academic Freedom
Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.