HxA Commends Harvard Medical School's "Open Inquiry Report"

The report's commitments track closely with HxA's four-point Open Inquiry U agenda

Read our announcement
Heterodox Academy
Back to Podcasts
Curious Man min
March 10, 2022

S1 Episode 33: Suppressing Curiosity: How GPAs, Forced Memorization, and Mandatory Exams May Undermine Open Inquiry

Apple Podcasts | Android | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Email | RSS

On today’s show, we explore the possibility that the ongoing crisis of free inquiry and viewpoint diversity in universities is not a sudden aberration, but instead the inevitable outcome of a rigid, top-down university system. From undermining students’ natural curiosity to increasing stress and anxiety, we talk with Dylan Selterman—Social-Personality Psychologist and Associate Teaching Professor at Johns Hopkins University—about the flaws in our current education system and his vision for a more student-led academic future.  Dylan’s blog post: “Curiosity Is One Key To Heterodoxy. Forced Memorization Is Not. For more from Dylan, check out his Psychology Today blog called The Resistance Hypothesis. He also hosts a podcast with Manuel Galvan called A Bit More Complicated (available at Apple Spotify Anchor).  Let us know what you think! For comments and questions email communications@heterodoxacademy.org. This episode was hosted by Zach Rausch, and produced by Davies Content.
Share:
Get HxA In Your Inbox
Related Podcasts
Smriti JT
S2 Episode 45: The Field That Studies Groupthink Is Captured by It | Smriti Mehta
April 20, 2026+Smriti Mehta
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Academic Freedom+The Free Exchange of Ideas
JT Sian
S2 Episode 44: Universities Have a Trust Problem. This President Is Trying to Fix It| Sian Beilock
March 31, 2026+Sian Leah Beilock
+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Open Inquiry+Academic Freedom+The Free Exchange of Ideas
Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.


This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.