Universities Can’t Pursue Truth Without Viewpoint Diversity

John Tomasi and Jonathan Haidt's latest op-ed on what we wish critics of viewpoint diversity on both the left and right would understand.

Read the op-ed
Heterodox Academy
Back to Reports
Civic Centers Cover Image
+Viewpoint Diversity+Academic Freedom

The New Landscape of “Civics Centers” in Higher Education

Since 2021, colleges and universities across the United States have seen a striking increase in the creation of “Civic Centers” focused on civic thought, civic discourse, or both. Although civics centers have existed for decades, their growth has accelerated dramatically, in part due to state legislative action. This rapid expansion has drawn attention from policymakers, faculty, and observers of higher education — supporters see civics centers as a constructive way to promote civic education and viewpoint diversity, while critics have raised concerns about faculty governance, academic freedom, and potential political influence.

To better understand this evolving sector, Heterodox Academy developed the first-of-its-kind public dataset cataloguing civics centers across U.S. higher education. The report identifies 45 centers at 41 institutions in 25 states, describes their institutional characteristics, and highlights emerging political and structural patterns — especially the rise of legislatively mandated centers at public universities. The analysis offers a clearer picture of how these centers are being formed, what they are designed to do, and how they differ across institution types. The report also outlines trends to watch as these centers mature, including faculty hiring patterns, impacts on student learning, and the relationship between civics centers and broader debates over academic freedom, political polarization, and viewpoint diversity.

Key findings include:

  • Half of all identified civics centers were founded in 2021 or later, with 13 new centers announced since 2023.
  • Of the 22 centers founded between 2022 and 2025, 59% were created through state legislation.
  • Public institutions tend to house autonomous, “civic thought” focused centers, whereas private institutions more often host semi-autonomous centers emphasizing “civic discourse.”
  • Centers created by legislative mandate, in states such as Ohio, Florida, and Tennessee, raise new issues around faculty governance, academic freedom, and institutional autonomy.
  • Centers cluster around two major themes: “civic thought” (classical liberalism, American founding, Western civilization) and “civic discourse” (dialogue across difference, viewpoint diversity).
Download the report

Thank you for your interest in Heterodox Academy's report. Enter your information below to access the pdf.

Get the full dataset

We compiled a dataset with 45 centers from 41 institutions and 25 states (including Washington, DC). We hope this dataset, along with the accompanying report, proves useful to higher educators and researchers who are working in civics centers or observing their development, and especially to advocates of the open inquiry goals — viewpoint diversity, constructive disagreement, and the free exchange of ideas — that HxA promotes.

Screenshot 2025 11 25 at 2 29 45 PM
Share:

Get HxA In Your Inbox

Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.