bar1 bar2 bar3

Tools & Resources

Guides & How-To's

How to Navigate Moral Disagreements

Despite assumptions to the contrary, people are not fundamentally rational. Research shows that when disagreements arise, appeals to rational standards, facts, or statistics can often polarize people more. When people feel threatened or cornered by the evidence, rather than conceding, they often kick debates into the moral sphere, where claims become much more difficult to falsify. In these instances, empirical evidence not only loses most of its force, but even arguments appealing to rivals’ own perceived interests can backfire.

These strategies summarize how to approach moral disagreements in constructive ways. HxA members and other heterodox enthusiasts who wish to help their students engage in open inquiry and constructive disagreement can use these strategies to build mutual understanding and have better conversations on difficult issues.

Tools & resources Thumbnail

Contribute tools & resources

We are compiling a compendium of initiatives, policies, programs, and other innovations that have been deployed in classrooms, on campuses, and in disciplines to support open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement. We want to hear practical strategies, tools, and resources that have worked for you, and that others can readily adapt and implement in their own institutions. These can range from entire courses to syllabi, reading lists, and research. Learn more & contribute.

facebook-icon twitter-icon instagram_aside linkedin_aside youtube_aside envelope_contact_page