LIVE EVENT: Measuring Campus Expression

Join HxA and FIRE for this live discussion | July 24, 3-4pm ET

Register
Heterodox Academy
Back to Podcasts
Image
February 14, 2024
+John Tomasi+Jamie Kalven
+Open Inquiry+Viewpoint Diversity+Constructive Disagreement+Campus Policy+Institutional Neutrality

S2 Episode 9: Should Universities Adopt Institutional Neutrality?

In this episode, John and award-winning journalist Jamie Kalven explore the complexities surrounding the idea of institutional neutrality within universities and its implications for promoting intellectual freedom and robust argument. 

They delve into the Kalven Report of 1967 from the University of Chicago. This landmark report sought to balance the preservation of academic freedom with the responsibility to uphold the university's mission and values. The report's nuanced approach is examined in the context of Harry Kalven’s legacy, a key figure in First Amendment jurisprudence. They also analyze the report's implications for addressing contentious political issues within academia.

Additionally, they discuss the gray areas and exceptions within the Kalven Report, which are brought about by the proactive engagement of students seeking to understand and promote the principles of academic inquiry. Emphasizing the importance of contextual application and disciplined discourse, they examine the university as a space for dangerous thinking and mutual engagement, aiming to promote deeper understanding amidst diverse perspectives.

Share:

Get HxA In Your Inbox

Related Podcasts
John austin JT
S2 Episode 26: Heterodoxy in High Schools: Lessons from Deerfield Academy
December 10, 2024+John Austin
+Viewpoint Diversity+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Institutional Neutrality
Elisha JT
S2 Episode 25: The Golden Era of Jewish-Muslim Dialogue: What Can We Learn Today?
November 26, 2024+Elisha Russ-Fishbane
+Viewpoint Diversity+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Faith & Religion
Hx A June8215of246
Make a Donation

Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.

This site use cookies.

To better improve your site experience, we collect some data. To see what types of information we collect, read our Cookie Policy.