Back to Podcasts
May 15, 2017
+Teaching
Episode 1: Jon Zimmerman, The Case for Contention
In this inaugural interview, Chris Martin speaks with Jon Zimmerman, professor of history of education at the Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania. Jon Zimmerman is a former social studies teacher and Peace Corps volunteer. His research has been about educational controversies and debates. He has published books about sex and alcohol education, history and religion in the curriculum, and other contentious topics. He is also a frequent contributor to the New York Times, the Washington Post, and the New York Review of Books. His latest sole-authored book is Campus Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know (2016). In this interview, Jon talks about his new book The Case for Contention: Teaching Controversial Issues in American Schools (2017), which he co-authored with Emily Robertson, professor of philosophy at Syracuse University.
0:00 Introducing Jon’s new book
4:50 Preparing teachers to present controversial issues
15:50 “Lies My Teachers Told Me” and the sanitization of history
21:34 What are Jon’s 5 rules for presenting controversial topics?
31:59 How do you respect people who act in bad faith or, like Trump, violate democratic norms?
41:17 Jon’s book on campus politics, and the psychologizing of political discussion through micro-aggression accusations
- Jon’s other books available here.
- More about Jon Zimmerman.
- We also discussed Lies My Teachers Told Me by James W. Loewen
Related Podcasts
S2 Episode 26: Heterodoxy in High Schools: Lessons from Deerfield Academy
December 10, 2024+John Austin
+Viewpoint Diversity+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Institutional Neutrality
S2 Episode 25: The Golden Era of Jewish-Muslim Dialogue: What Can We Learn Today?
November 26, 2024+Elisha Russ-Fishbane
+Viewpoint Diversity+Open Inquiry+Constructive Disagreement+Teaching+Faith & Religion
great minds don't
always think alike
Make a Donation
Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.