STEM
Science is widely revered. Paradoxically, though, that respect comes from a process of constant, rigorous questioning.
Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) fields once seemed shielded from trends against open inquiry and viewpoint diversity, but recent controversies have brought heterodox issues front and center.
When scientific bodies restrict data access, de-fund or stigmatize certain hypotheses, or even make political endorsements, many STEM researchers worry about the long-term impacts for the sciences, including their life-changing discoveries and innovations.
- Filter by Format
- All Formats
- Announcement
- Blog
- Event
- Podcast
- Video
- Heterodox Academy Hosts Scholar Summit on COVID Pandemic, Lessons Learned About Open InquiryApril 5, 2024+Public Policy+STEM
- Open Inquiry in STEM Disciplines Grant Program: Request for ProposalsNovember 6, 2023+STEM+Research & Publishing
- Heterodox Academy Announces New Initiative Focused on Open Inquiry in STEMOctober 25, 2023+Open Inquiry+STEM
- STEM Needs More Women – and the Social Sciences Need More Men.September 13, 2023+Nafees Alam+STEM+Research & Publishing+Viewpoint Diversity
- Managing the Metrics of Academic PublishingApril 13, 2023+Stuart Macdonald+STEM+Research & Publishing+Academic Careers
- Partisan Science is Bad for Science and Society+Research & Publishing+STEM+Public Policy+Open Inquiry
- Three Roadblocks in Academia That Limit Science CommunicationAugust 11, 2022+Steven Zhou+Research & Publishing+Academic Careers+STEM
Your generosity supports our non-partisan efforts to advance the principles of open inquiry, viewpoint diversity, and constructive disagreement to improve higher education and academic research.